Ha, excellent John and thanks for the Layman piece, glorious. I'm reminded of Sean Esjbörn-Hargens framing of non-dual and the varieties of this: currently at 31 flavours, 3 major categories, 4 meta entry points, 3 classifications through which this all could be primarily experienced and...
Well, very aligned with the call Layman is making (albeit from a different starting point):
"remaining open to opposite possible descriptions that we create the conditions under we can begin to actually think clearly and newly about this uniquely enticing form of experience."
Short version: treat it as true AND treat it lightly, what else is true too?
And a practical usefulness of all of this? For me it helps host spaces of knowing nothing while simultaneously serving from wisdom... Always useful ;-)
Ha, excellent John and thanks for the Layman piece, glorious. I'm reminded of Sean Esjbörn-Hargens framing of non-dual and the varieties of this: currently at 31 flavours, 3 major categories, 4 meta entry points, 3 classifications through which this all could be primarily experienced and...
Well, very aligned with the call Layman is making (albeit from a different starting point):
"remaining open to opposite possible descriptions that we create the conditions under we can begin to actually think clearly and newly about this uniquely enticing form of experience."
Short version: treat it as true AND treat it lightly, what else is true too?
And a practical usefulness of all of this? For me it helps host spaces of knowing nothing while simultaneously serving from wisdom... Always useful ;-)
Short version: treat it as true AND treat it lightly, what else is true too?
Great summary, thanks.
Hi John. Nice to glimpse some of the bits that were salient for you.